I was thinking right along with the article, saying to myself that this is a good argument against government restrictions on personal ownership of firearms.
As a PS to the Thin Line...I'm pursuing a Q/A: Why didn't the SCOTUS decisions mentioned absolve the Uvalde TX an Parkinson FL PDs from the inaction for which they were criticized. Other than voluntary resignations and one case that ended in acquittal, no LEO was charged with anything. But the SCOTUS decisions were not cited as a defense.
Taking Latin 101might help some. I took 4 years of it thinking I was going to law school. (stop laughing).
Pls lemme no how the law suit turns out - if I haven't assumed room temperature first. Everybody should become an attorney. The State is so strapped for $$$ they'll be attempting all things visible and invisible. There will be plenty of opportunities to keep them tied up in court. Especially good if an injunction can be secured first!
great article. I would prefer unalienable rights. Inalienable rights can be taken, unalienable rights can never be taken. Unalienable is used in the Declaration of Independence. Probably meaningless but that's what I think.
I was thinking right along with the article, saying to myself that this is a good argument against government restrictions on personal ownership of firearms.
Personally, I don't see much fighting going on...
As a PS to the Thin Line...I'm pursuing a Q/A: Why didn't the SCOTUS decisions mentioned absolve the Uvalde TX an Parkinson FL PDs from the inaction for which they were criticized. Other than voluntary resignations and one case that ended in acquittal, no LEO was charged with anything. But the SCOTUS decisions were not cited as a defense.
Taking Latin 101might help some. I took 4 years of it thinking I was going to law school. (stop laughing).
Pls lemme no how the law suit turns out - if I haven't assumed room temperature first. Everybody should become an attorney. The State is so strapped for $$$ they'll be attempting all things visible and invisible. There will be plenty of opportunities to keep them tied up in court. Especially good if an injunction can be secured first!
great article. I would prefer unalienable rights. Inalienable rights can be taken, unalienable rights can never be taken. Unalienable is used in the Declaration of Independence. Probably meaningless but that's what I think.
Thanks. Good point. Corrected.
Most have yet to learn that. Quite a surprise when they do...
Re "Public at Large" - certainly you know of America's obesity epidemic....