A conundrum indeed. It seems to me that the only model with any hope of succeeding would be the C-Span remedy...an industry-based entity that aspires to provide the service for the good of all. We know, however, such a structure is susceptible to the same issues of collective versus individual as are most things in our society. Just as the Sci-fi world has often predicted, we are doomed by our unending efforts to destroy ourselves.
"Claude: What do you think would be more valuable - increasing technical transparency, or focusing on better communicating practical implications and limitations to non-technical stakeholders?"
A: Claude is an intellectual nobody who likes to use big words.
B: There is no comma after "transparency." Claude fucked up his grammar. He's no genius.
This was excellent Brian!
A conundrum indeed. It seems to me that the only model with any hope of succeeding would be the C-Span remedy...an industry-based entity that aspires to provide the service for the good of all. We know, however, such a structure is susceptible to the same issues of collective versus individual as are most things in our society. Just as the Sci-fi world has often predicted, we are doomed by our unending efforts to destroy ourselves.
"The combination of accelerating complexity and divergent interests creates a situation where traditional oversight models break down." Claude
What is a "traditional oversight model"?
Claude is speaking in riddles.
Thanks for the article, but it just proves to me that Claude is human and as full of shite as everyone else.
"Claude: What do you think would be more valuable - increasing technical transparency, or focusing on better communicating practical implications and limitations to non-technical stakeholders?"
A: Claude is an intellectual nobody who likes to use big words.
B: There is no comma after "transparency." Claude fucked up his grammar. He's no genius.
Timmy sorry, you feel so , threatened , by punctuation, and vocabulary.