8 Comments

It's akin to the #COVIDHoax, in which the predominant political narrative presumed everyone guilty of being a "grandma killer!" The solution was for the government to save everyone by violating rights via lockdowns, face-diaper mandates, media censorship, and gene-therapy injections.

It's worse than "guilty until proven innocent"; you're guilty, and you might not ever get to prove your innocence.

Expand full comment
author

How can one appeal an unconstitutional ruling by the Supreme Court...

Expand full comment

For the statist-minded good citizens, go to the globalists at the UN, WEF, WHO, etc.? :-D

Expand full comment
author

How?

Expand full comment

How would I know? I'm a bad citizen, remember? ;-)

Also, in all seriousness, there seems to be an error in your premise, if I understand the Constitution (and, admittedly, I might not . . . bad citizen): "an unconstitutional ruling by the Supreme Court."

I thought, by definition, that all Supreme Court rulings are Constitutional, since the Supreme Court gets to interpret what the Constitution means. Is there such a thing as an unconstitutional ruling by the Supreme Court?

Expand full comment
author

Don't you support infallibility?

Expand full comment

I'm against "expert culture" . . . I support sound logic, evidence where evidence is claimed, and natural human rights :-)

Expand full comment
founding

The courts in the USA are a bad joke. Judges are little emperors who think they own their courtrooms and we are all just peasants to be dealt with on the whim of the judges.

Expand full comment