7 Comments

I received an email this morning from Trending Politics News. Not saying I agree, but interesting thought. People come up with all kinds of scenarios.

Fellow Patriot,

I come to you today with good news and bad news.

The good news is that I believe President Trump will win the 2024 election.

The bad news? I believe the Democrats will refuse to give him power and certify his victory.

As Vice President, Kamala Harris has the 'final say' when certifying election results on January 6, 2025. I predict she is going to refuse to certify his victory and become installed as the 47th President. And how do I know this? Because the writing is on the wall...

In the past week, Democrats have begun calling Trump a "Fascist".

But why? Are they trying to scare voters into choosing her? Yes, but the REAL reason is even more sinister.... If they paint Trump as "H*tler", they will be fully justified to refuse him power. I mean, what could be more "patriotic" than denying a "fascist" power?

This is what they are going to do, and I fear for what will happen to our country if this happens. In short, ALL HELL would break loose.

Expand full comment

Thanks for that.

I hate to say, "I told you so, " but my 10/30 post, "30 Days...Then?" anticipated that scenario, although not the legislated monkey business per se. Chaos—civil unrest from any source will be volatile to the extreme.

OTOH, I would take exception to the "Hitler" justification. Lawfare notwithstanding, calling someone names may justify their action in their minds but even the most jaded jurist would have to face the Supreme Robes if he went along with a stunt like that. With at least half the country amped in opposition, the only guarantee would be that chaos - in spades. The Robes wouldn't want that legacy pinned to their resumes. How Certification would be resolved with pure Democratic opposition is the question. In the face of a 'civil war, there may be enough cooler heads to pull it over the line....and the speculation continues!

Expand full comment

I think Trump learned quite a lot from his previous term and listened to many people he should not have. I don't believe you are going to see that again this time. He has his X-Men team lined up (per Dr. Jordan Peterson). Elon Musk, Robert Kennedy, Vivek Ramaswamy, Tulsi Gabbard and JD Vance. I believe if he wins, we will see that team be in on a number of decisions. I believe he can trust these people unlike many he enlisted the first time. He listened to many people he should not have. I don't believe he realized how deep the deep state really was.

Expand full comment

Thanks for your message. It's clear that Trump entered Washington with a significant level of naivety, which is understandable given his background. However, he’s a fast learner, though four years wasn't sufficient to learn + accomplish everything.

You’re right about his “X-Men” team, but their success hinges entirely on winning—an outcome that poses our country's biggest challenge. The Deep State is riddled with corruption and outright malice. But now, their actions are driven more by fear than addiction to power. Those involved in the last four years and previous administrations justifiably fear for their safety if Trump returns to the White House. They have repeatedly demonstrated that they will stop at nothing to achieve their objectives.

As Don Williams pointed out during our podcast, there’s a widely held belief that Trump must not be allowed back in office. He has learned valuable lessons and now understands precisely where and how to 'drain the swamp.' He can do it, but will he? Even a "too big to rig" landslide victory doesn’t guarantee his survival through inauguration. Moreover, the Deep State has various means of control that go beyond mere threats. This is the reality we need to confront.

Expand full comment

Brian, I voted for Trump in 2016 and 2020. He let me down bigtime. Personnel is policy. Trump doesn't have the personnel to back him up. In business, Trump can have a couple managers and an accountant and become a billionaire. That won't work in Washington DC. Trump needs at least 50 people he can trust to get the job done.

And why would anyone work for Trump? Trump let General Flynn spin in the wind. Trump let the Jan 6th protesters rot in jail. He could have pardoned them.

Trump is not loyal to his team. So, he has no team.

Expand full comment

As a political rookie with the naivete that comes with it, there's no doubt he screwed several pooches. That, along with the massive full-frontal, non-stop efforts to block and harrass his every effort, it's surprising he accomplished as much as he did. I wonder what other individual could have managed that - along with the continuing Lawfare still being waged against him. Like everyone on the planet, he's imperfect, screws up, makes unforced errors. At the moment, however, I don't see anyone anywhere who could make some positive difference in the country's immediate future. Without the time and resources to thoroughly clean the Augean Stables aka DC, I'll be OK with whatever he may accomplish should my previously posted "predictions" be wrong about Nov 5th. I have more days behind me than ahead of me. Since such a cleansing action is not likely in my time remaining, I'll enjoy what I can get for as long as I last.

Expand full comment

Brian, Trump is better than Harris if only to avoid the cringe factor when she speaks. Once the Big Boys killed JFK in Dallas and got away with it, the country was going to go in this direction of war, censorship, and lots of debt. If Trump can lower taxes a little bit, I'll be happy.

Expand full comment